![]() ![]() Using 圆4 Native Tools Command Prompt for VS 2022 C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Community>cd If 圆4 Native Tools Command Prompt for VS 2022 can not be found odds are Visual Studio 2022 was not installed correctly. Using Windows search enter 圆4 then in list above that click on To find 圆4 Native Tools Command Prompt for VS 2022 Start 圆4 Native Tools Command Prompt for VS 2022 Sounds like a needless task but really does eliminate many problems along the way as it jogs ones memory if the check fails. Note: Some commands are run first simply to get a response as a check. In the following instructions this will be referred to as Note: As this needs a build directory to build the source code into the executables create a build directory that does not need admin permission to change files, e.g. Curious to know if this works with Visual Studio installed on a Mac.There is a free edition (community) which requires one to sign up for subscription which is also free.Note: This does not use MinGW, MSYS2, Cygwin, GCC, Ninja, CMake or any sort of cross build. The second part (test) is for those using SWI-Prolog and want to test zlib1.dll as used by SWI-Prolog. The first part (build) does not use SWI-Prolog and is for those who my find themselves here needing to know how to build zlib1.dll on Windows. Was able to replace it with the one in C:\Program Files\swipl\bin\zlib1.dll and successfully run the SWI-Prolog zlib package tests. Now have zlib building on Windows 10 using Visual Studio 2022 generating zlib1.dll without any problems. Would not have to do a cross build on Linux for the Windows version. Luckily I have not had to do this yet with SWI-Prolog. If you build from source and leave in the debug info, then you can track down some really low level bugs. If you want to add some low level functionality in C and don’t develop on Linux, then being able to write the low level C on Windows and then build on Windows would nice. doesn’t cause problems and can take care of problems like unresolved file locations by issuing errors and warnings, then SWI-Prolog could be built simply by downloading the source from GitHub, bringing the source into MS Visual Studio, (community version is free), and then just press F5 and get a running version of SWI-Prolog. So why would someone want to build SWI-Prolog from source on Windows using MS Visual Studio? AFAIK there would be no advantage to building on Windows with MS Visual Studio vs building on Linux, Mac. I think Jan is trying to say that for those who develop on Windows, like me, and want to build the code from source, this would be a better means in some scenarios. What is the advantage of compiling with MS Visual Studio? The ports I found are in the table below. Some problematic issues are GMP and ossp-uuid. This deals with quite a few dependencies. Think about the whole set of requirements.I’m wondering whether there are people out there who wish to take this to the next level. swipl-win.exe fails for some Windows resource handling issue.Builds swipl.exe which seems to work fine (minimal testing).Z:\conan\win64 is where I installed the zlib binary (dll and include), misusing the MinGW location handling for dependencies. The CMake config run is mkdir build.vs2019Ĭmake -DMINGW_ROOT=z:/conan/win64 -DMULTI_THREADED=OFF -DUSE_GMP=OFF -DSWIPL_PACKAGES=OFF -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug -G "Visual Studio 16 2019" -A 圆4. I pushed some updates to swipl-devel that allowed me building swipl.exe for single-threaded use and without GMP. The migration to CMake opens the route to build SWI-Prolog on Windows using Microsoft Visual Studio. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |